Have a tech question? Please feel free to send us an email, and we’ll do our best to post a response.
| Tech Tip | Subject |
| #1 |
|
| #2 |
Aspect Ratios and Formats |
| #3 |
Shooting for HD |
| #4 |
An Introduction to 3–Perf |
An Introduction to 3–Perf

Shrinking budgets are something all of us in the production community can relate to. Almost paradoxically, as productions become more and more complex the pressure only seems to increase to deliver more, faster and on a tighter budget. Fortunately, advances in motion picture technology continue to offer new solutions to meet these narrowing constraints and deliver more for less. One such solution is the 3-perforation motion picture camera movement (3-Perf), a simple but effective adaptation of existing 35mm motion picture camera technology that offers a 25% savings in raw film stock consumption (and processing, concordantly) with no reduction in image quality. This article will explain how 3-Perf works, as well as the advantages (and disadvantages) associated with its use.
First, some terms:
Movement
Registration
Pulldown
Aperture
Super35
Aspect Ratio
I. A Brief History of Motion Picture Camera Movements
Since its standardization in the early part of the 20th century, the basic
mechanical functions of a 35mm motion picture camera have remained remarkably
unchanged. Sophisticated contemporary electronics aside, a motion picture
camera remains at its core a lightproof box with a lens on it through which
film is passed one frame at a time to be exposed. The film is transported
from the magazine through the camera body by means of sprockets and/or rollers
that interface with perforations punched into the sides of the film (64
per side per foot) until it reaches the gate, where the actual exposure
takes place. In a traditional camera movement, once at the gate the film
is advanced four perforations at a time by the pulldown claw(s) and held
against the aperture of the gate while the shutter swings open to expose
it and create one frame. Once exposure is complete, the shutter closes and
the film advances by another four perforations to repeat the cycle and create
the next frame.
In the early days of cinematography before the advent of sync sound (and the concordant need for an optical sound track on the film), each exposed frame utilized the full width of the negative to record an image roughly four perforations high with an aspect ratio of 1.33:1, conventionally known today as "Full Frame" or "Silent" aperture. Once optical sound recording appeared this image area was reduced in both width and height to make room for the sound track alongside the image, yielding the Academy 1.37:1 aspect ratio common for theatrical production up until the 1950's when various anamorphic widescreen aspect ratios were adopted to compete with television.
Up until this point the 4-perforation camera movement remained efficient because all of the conventionally used aspect ratios, when combined with the optical soundtrack, utilized nearly all of the available negative area allowed by the silent aperture.Anamorphic was not without its disadvantages,
however; the lenses were (and still are) slow, heavy and expensive, and
by the 1970's filmmakers were increasingly electing to shoot 1.85:1 widescreen
using spherical (non-anamorphic) lenses. This method offered the advantage
of lighter, faster, cheaper (and often optically superior) spherical lenses
instead of the cumbersome anamorphics, but because it utilized less of the
negative area (the top and bottom of the camera aperture matted off to create
the more rectangular aspect ratio) it had the concordant disadvantages of
lower picture quality than anamorphic and inefficient use of the negative
since only a fraction of the total available imaging area was used. The
development of Super35, digital intermediate and more advanced film emulsions
have improved picture quality with spherical widescreen to the extent that
it is no longer considered significantly inferior to anamorphic in that
respect, but the inefficient use of negative remains a concern. Originally
conceived of in Russia and developed by numerous cinematographers and camera
companies since, 3-Perf offers a solution to that inefficiency.
II. 3-Perf: Theory, Applications and Advantages
The basic premise of 3-Perf is a simple one: because spherical widescreen
aspect ratios do not require a full four perforations' worth of negative
area, when shooting in these aspect ratios a modified camera movement is
used that advances the film three perforations per pulldown stroke instead
of four. This reduces film consumption by 25%, which translates into a 25%
savings in the cost of stock purchase and processing. For feature films
and episodic television, which routinely consume hundreds of thousands of
feet of film in the course of production, that cost savings can be substantial.
Reduced film consumption also means more filming time per magazine, which
gives directors and cinematographers more creative flexibility by allowing
potentially longer takes (useful for Steadicam and handheld situations where
400' magazines must be used) and saving time on set by reducing the frequency
of camera reloads. 3-Perf also allows the camera to run more quietly since
the film transport mechanism doesn't need to run as quickly, allowing the
camera to get closer to the action without sound problems.
III. Limitations of 3-Perf
Though 3-Perf does offer many advantages over traditional 4-Perf filming,
unfortunately it is not without its own drawbacks and limitations. First
and foremost, having been designed for use with widescreen aspect ratios
3-Perf is most effective only when shooting in a 1.78:1 aspect ratio or
wider. While this makes it ideally suited to productions intended for HDTV
delivery, the standard definition NTSC aspect ratio of 1.33:1 can only be
achieved in 3-Perf by shrinking the image area to fit within the reduced
vertical dimension allowed by 3-Perf. While still acceptable with slower,
fine-grained films, this can lead to undesirably apparent film grain with
high speed emulsions. In situations where 3-Perf originated material will
be delivered as a film print (i.e. theatrical exhibition or film dailies
screening) an additional optical printing step is necessary to transpose
the 3-Perf camera original onto a projection-capable 4-Perf interpositive
or print.
Not all motion picture cameras can be converted to 3-Perf, and among those that can the groundglasses and aperture plates/masks for certain aspect ratios may not be available. Within the Arri line of cameras, only the 235, 535 and Arricam can be modified for 3-Perf filming. The Arriflex 435 is available with a 3-Perf movement but cannot be changed between 3-Perf and 4-Perf; the movement is permanently installed and a complete new camera body must be ordered if 3-Perf shooting is required. 3-Perf aspect ratio choices are limited to 1.33:1. 1.66:1. 1.78:1 and 1.85:1 in Regular 35 with 1.78:1, 1.85:1 and 2.35:1 available in Super35. Similarly, telecine and optical printing systems require special modification to handle 3-Perf and may not be available at all labs and postproduction facilities.
The final and most significant limitation of 3-Perf is its limited availability:
as of this writing only a handful of west-coast camera rental companies
have the capability to perform the necessary modifications to convert a
camera to 3-Perf in-house, a difficult process that requires specialized
training, expensive precision tools and four to eight hours of work depending
on the complexity of the camera and the skill of the technician. The 3-Perf
movements themselves also quite expensive, often costing nearly as much
as a complete camera body, so even those camera rental companies that do
carry them keep a limited number on-hand. Companies without the necessary
tools and parts must send their cameras back to the manufacturer for conversion
and incur the additional costs of shipping, renting the replacement movement
and paying for the conversion, all of which must be repeated to return the
camera to 4-perf upon completion of a production. These costs are passed
on to the production renting the equipment such that it often doesn't make
economic sense to pay for the conversion unless the production stands to
save substantial film and processing costs by doing so. It is always essential
when considering 3-Perf shooting to consult with the camera rental company
and postproduction facility well in advance of commencing production to
confirm availability/compatibility and ensure sufficient time to make the
modifications necessary for 3-Perf shooting and telecine.
Article and Illustrations © Schumacher Camera 2006
New expanded hours!
8:00 am to 10:00 pm CST
Schumacher Camera
1147 West Ohio Street
Chicago, Illinois 60622
312-243-3400
info@schumachercamera.com
Copyright © 2003-2008 Schumacher Camera and Innovative Design & Graphics